Crime | mistrial Lindsay Clancy Jurors Describe Standoff With 'Holdout' Juror Jurors describe holdout who wouldn't vote to acquit, despite acknowledging reasonable doubt By Evann Gastaldo withNewser.AI Posted Sep 9, 2026 12:00 AM CDT Copied Defendant Lindsay Clancy looks at the jury after Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial in Clancy's murder trial on Friday, Sept. 4, 2026, in Plymouth, Mass. (Greg Derr/The Patriot Ledger via AP, Pool) Jurors from a closely watched Massachusetts murder case are recalling how one of their own brought deliberations to a standstill. Three women who served on the Lindsay Clancy jury, including foreperson Roni Carlson, told NBC10 Boston they were left exasperated by a single male juror they describe as a holdout. Carlson said he acknowledged having reasonable doubt but still refused to vote that Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity. The panel's bitter split, which included shouting and name-calling loud enough for alternates to hear, ended with a mistrial last week. The three jurors said they and eight of the other nine jurors were ultimately convinced by the defense that Clancy's mental state and medications mattered, and they criticized prosecutors while calling defense attorney Kevin Reddington more "authentic." NBC10 Boston says it has tried to reach the holdout juror—whom one of the jurors described in the interview as "very arrogant," according to USA Today. The jury was made up of nine women and three men, the New York Times reports. Read These Next Netherlands confirms a 1-year-old was euthanized. County removes Flock cameras, finds a mystery. John Goodman has lost around 200 pounds, without using Ozempic. Lawyers say hospital is fighting to keep Christa Pike alive. Report an error