After Court Loss, Biden Abandons Ghostwriter Suit

Judges had ruled that public interest outweighs former president's personal privacy
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Jul 21, 2026 7:55 AM CDT
Updated Jul 25, 2026 1:20 PM CDT
Appeals Court Rebuffs Biden Bid to Block Ghostwriter Chats
President Biden speaks in Charleston, South Carolina, on Jan. 19, 2025.   (AP photo/Stephanie Scarbrough, file)
UPDATE Jul 25, 2026 1:20 PM CDT

Joe Biden has dropped his lawsuit to block the release of recordings from pre-presidential interviews with a ghostwriter. His lawyers filed the notice Friday in US District Court in Washington, DC, after the former president lost a court ruling in the case earlier in the week, the Hill reports. Biden could have petitioned the Supreme Court or sought a rehearing by the full US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, per the AP.

Jul 21, 2026 7:55 AM CDT

A federal appeals court has rejected a request by Joe Biden to block the release of audio recordings and transcripts of his interviews with a memoir ghostwriter before he was elected president. A divided three-judge panel from the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit suspended its decision until Aug. 3 to allow more time for Biden to consider another appeal, the AP reports. The panel's 2-1 ruling on Monday found there's a "substantial" public interest in disclosing the material that Biden wants to keep under wraps. Redactions to the recordings would help protect Biden's privacy, the majority noted.

"We conclude that any remaining incursion on personal privacy from disclosure of the now-redacted materials likely does not outweigh the public interest in disclosure," the court wrote. Mark Zwonitzer, who worked with Biden on his two memoirs, interviewed the Democrat at his home in 2016 and 2017. Biden's lawyers say the conversations were candid, personal, and intended to remain private. The recordings were obtained by special counsel Robert Hur, who investigated Biden's handling of classified documents from his time as a senator from Delaware and as vice president. Republicans in Congress demanded the material after Hur declined to file charges against the then-president.

Biden sued and sought an injunction to prevent the Justice Department under President Trump, a Republican, from releasing the recordings to Congress and the conservative Heritage Foundation. The department had previously argued the recordings were exempt from disclosure under public records law. Biden appealed after US District Judge Dabney Friedrich ruled in June that the public interest in the material outweighed whatever privacy rights Biden had. Friedrich was nominated by Trump. The appeal was heard by DC Circuit Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Judges Gregory Katsas and Florence Pan. Pan, who was nominated by Biden, dissented from the majority opinion. Srinivasan was nominated by President Obama, a Democrat who chose Biden as his vice president. Katas was nominated by Trump.

Read These Next
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X
More News: Entertainment | News | Sports | Health | Politics