Families of nonspeaking autistic children are making cross-country treks for a controversial promise: that a simple letter board can finally let their kids speak for themselves. At the center of their efforts is the Rapid Prompting Method, or RPM, an "assisted spelling" technique that works off the assumption that many nonspeakers have normal or exceptional intelligence blocked by motor and sensory issues, not cognitive limits, per the New York Times. Some users of the technique—invented by Soma Mukhopadhyay, the mom of a nonspeaking autistic son—have written books, gone on to higher education, and even landed on federal autism panels. "It gives parents like us access to something that our children have never had," says the dad of a 33-year-old man who started using RPM two years ago and is now attending college, with his father's help.
But there's almost no solid science behind the methods, and the few blind tests echo a troubling history: Earlier "facilitated communication" efforts were found to reflect the helper's thoughts, not the disabled person's. Practitioners now largely refuse such testing. That leaves a stark divide between parents who say lived experience is proof enough and researchers warning of hijacked voices, false hope, and real risk. For parents who stand by the method, however, that overarching debate is irrelevant when looked at in the context of their child's successes. "We see what we see and we know," says the aunt of a 22-year-old autistic woman from Texas who is said to communicate regularly now using assisted spelling. "We don't need data to know that it's real." More here.
,
uBlock 
,
and
Ghostery 
)
