DOJ Reviews 1K Illinois Cases After Grand Jury Allegations

Misconduct accusations ended immigration protest prosecution
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Jul 1, 2026 7:00 PM CDT
DOJ Reviews 1K Cases to See If Prosecutors Acted Ethically
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche moves to the podium after US Attorney Andrew Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois spoke at a news conference at the Department of Justice on Wednesday, July 1, 2026, in Washington.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Justice Department officials are conducting a sweeping review of more than 1,000 grand jury presentations made by Illinois prosecutors following the dismissal of a high-profile case over misconduct, the top federal prosecutor for Chicago said on Wednesday. Andrew Boutros, US attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, said the review will include all pending grand jury proceedings in his district as well as other presentations by prosecutors going back almost 20 years, the AP reports. It was sparked by revelations of grand jury misconduct that forced prosecutors to abandon a case against four activists who protested outside a federal building during last year's immigration enforcement operation in the city.

"It's going to be a massive review, a comprehensive review and it is underway," said Boutros. He said the process is meant to ensure that his prosecutors have "acted ethically" and to provide "assurances and confidence" that other pending cases have not been tainted by similar issues. The Justice Department dropped charges against the activists in May after a judge scrutinized allegations of misconduct, which included a prosecutor meeting with a grand juror outside proceedings and other jurors who disagreed with the case being dismissed from participating. When the case was dismissed, Boutros told a judge that the conduct was upsetting, adding that: "No one acted with the intent to mislead, your honor."

The judge overseeing the case took the extraordinary step last month of releasing the transcripts of the presentation made by prosecutors, who were seeking to secure an indictment against the activists in the most high-profile case to come out of the crackdown that rippled across the nation's third-largest city and its suburbs last year. The transcripts showed that one of the grand jurors called the case a "crock of (expletive)." The grand juror was subsequently excused from the proceedings.

Read These Next
Get the news faster.
Tap to install our app.
X
Install the Newser News app
in two easy steps:
1. Tap in your navigation bar.
2. Tap to Add to Home Screen.

X
More News: News | World | Politics | Sports | Tech