Bill Gates just dropped a 6,000-word essay on AI, and the takeaway is grim: There is no plan, and that needs to change now. In an essay on his website, the Microsoft co-founder warns that AI is gunning for both office and manual jobs, and that "even under the best circumstances, the transition to this new AI era will be one of the most turbulent times in human history. Right now, we are not preparing for it. I don't see evidence that leaders, experts, and communities are confronting the challenges adequately." The Wall Street Journal reports that sentiment was his impetus for writing. Gates says he plans to bring up the issue every time he meets with national and global leaders going forward.
Though he does flag AI's potential to revolutionize areas like healthcare and agriculture for our benefit, the bulk of his essay reads as a warning. Six major points Gates makes:
- White- and blue-collar jobs will be impacted in a decade, something we have no precedent for. The shift from agriculture to office work took several generations, he points out.
- The potential for harm is huge. AI will empower "criminals with very limited skills" to go after "individuals, companies, and governments." And "eventually, the power to use AI to harm people will not be limited to people or institutions," but could be wielded by AI systems themselves, a topic he says he'll return to in the future.
- The threat to critical thinking is real, and it's a true threat. "In an era of deepfakes and misinformation that can be tailored to you individually, the ability to tell what is true from what is not becomes an essential life skill."
- We need to immediately embark on "a monumental task: creating a domestic and international framework for dealing with AI." As he explains, "Our existing bureaucracy is not designed to manage. A labor department may understand workforce disruption but not security risk. A business regulator may understand market concentration but not AI's effects on children and teenagers. Left to themselves, institutions will see only one part of the system, while the consequences of AI will ripple across the entire system."
- We should establish "Human Reserved" jobs, ones set aside for only people to do. Some, like caregiving, require empathy; others might be set aside for now with the intention of phasing in AI slowly. "We may do it because allowing machines to take over a certain role will displace a large number of people who can't easily change jobs. You can't tell a 55-year-old who has worked in construction their whole career that they need to go work at an elder care facility and expect them to find it fulfilling."
- AI tokens and robots should be taxed. "Right now, if you're an employer and you hire someone, you pay payroll taxes on their earnings. But if you buy a robot, you can usually write it off right away as a business expense. The tax system nudges you toward replacing people with machines. A tax would slow the rush away from human labor a little and raise money for retraining and a stronger safety net."