Politics | Rupert Murdoch Judge Tosses Trump's Defamation Suit Against WSJ Judge cites lack of actual malice in Epstein coverage, but will allow president to file amended complaint By John Johnson withNewser.AI Posted Apr 13, 2026 9:13 AM CDT Copied President Trump speaks with reporters after disembarking Air Force One, Sunday, April 12, 2026, at Joint Base Andrews, Md. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson) President Trump's multibillion-dollar defamation case against Rupert Murdoch and the Wall Street Journal just hit a wall—but not a dead end. A federal judge in Miami on Monday threw out Trump's $10 billion lawsuit over a story alleging that he sent a "bawdy" 50th birthday card and illustration to Jeffrey Epstein, ruling that Trump failed to show the paper acted with "actual malice," reports CNBC. Because Trump is a public figure, he must prove the Journal knew the claims were false or recklessly ignored the truth, a high bar set by Supreme Court precedent. Judge Darrin Gayles found the lawsuit didn't plausibly make that case, but said Trump can try again. Citing another legal precedent, Gayles ruled that when a complaint is dismissed for not adequately alleging actual malice, the plaintiff should be given a chance to amend and refile—something Trump is now permitted to do. The president has denied writing the note bearing his signature to Epstein, which was included in a compilation of birthday wishes from global bigwigs. Read These Next Virginia bus crash killed an entire family as they drove to wedding. The states with the most and least college graduates. Crew turns plane around over Bluetooth device name. The body of a 42-year-old reality star found in Washington river. Get breaking news in your inbox. What you need to know, as soon as we know it. Sign up Report an error