Lindsay Clancy's lawyer argued Tuesday that there wasn't enough evidence to prove she killed her three children, a striking turn after a lengthy trial that focused more on her mental state than on whether she took their lives. "This entire case is based on speculation," attorney Kevin Reddington said during the first hearing since Clancy's initial trial ended Sept. 4 with a deadlocked jury, per the AP. During the trial, he didn't dispute that Clancy killed the children at the family's home in 2023, instead seeking to persuade a jury to find her not criminally responsible because of mental disease—a rare condition called postpartum psychosis, according to the defense. But on Tuesday, in the wake of a mistrial with the jury split 11 to 1 in Clancy's favor, Reddington sought to persuade Judge William Sullivan to acquit her.
There is, Reddington contended, not enough evidence "that this woman killed those children." He pointed to matters ranging from her condition when she was found, badly injured and bleeding, in the yard outside her home to her lack of memory of what happened when she woke up in a hospital. At the first trial, her now ex-husband and first responders testified that she tried to kill herself immediately after killing the children. "Where is the admission? Where does she say that she did this?" Reddington asked, going on to recap his arguments that she was also psychotic and delusional at the time of the children's deaths.
Prosecutor Shanan Buckingham called his argument "laughable," pointing to various evidence raised during the trial. In court papers filed Monday, prosecutors recapped their arguments that there was enough evidence to convict Clancy. The prosecution maintains that Clancy, a 36-year-old former labor and delivery nurse, killed the children then used multiple methods to try to end her life, and that she knew what she was doing was wrong. The judge didn't immediately decide, and no trial date was set. Clancy's attorneys have asked the judge to dismiss the criminal case. Among other things, they argued that the judge should have ousted one juror who favored a murder conviction after the jury foreperson complained he was refusing to listen to the law on reasonable doubt.
Tuesday's hearing could also reveal whether prosecutors will move to put Clancy on trial for a second time. Prosecutors can choose to retry her on first-degree murder charges or seek to try her only on lesser charges, including second-degree murder or manslaughter, or drop the case entirely. Prosecutors said Clancy acted deliberately when she strangled 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan Clancy with exercise bands. They said she contrived to get her husband out of the house on Jan. 24, 2023. Clancy remains charged with murder and is expected to stay at a psychiatric hospital until her case is resolved. She has been paralyzed from the waist down since jumping from a second-story window after strangling her children.
,
uBlock 
,
and
Ghostery 
)
